Time to Write

I guess there are a million reasons why I don’t write in this blog as often, and I can examine all of them, but most of the things I list will be excuses. The real reason is that I simply don’t make the time to sit down in front of the computer and let thoughts flow through my brain, into my fingers, pass through the keyboard, and land on the blog. I simply don’t make the time. Now, should I make the time? Yes, because I’ve been letting myself coast instead of truly examining my thoughts and behavior. I must live an examined life, so to speak. So, let’s take the time to think about things, even if my thoughts aren’t perfect.

I believe the Occupy movement is rather important — not just now, but in a historical sense. I’ve been reading Glenn Greenwald’s new book, and I’m getting angry about things I had let myself forget. (Why did I forget about telco immunity after illegal wiretapping? Probably a lack of agency, but that’s just an excuse.) His book shows how the elite escape the justice system in America. The US is controlled by an oligarchy, which isn’t bad in and of itself, but it becomes bad when these rulers aren’t constrained by the rule of law. Who is in this oligarchy? Government, corporate leaders, media? Because of the revolving door, there’s no meaningful distinction here. They’re all the same people, switching from job to job. So, when people argue about the blame in the financial crisis, whether it was government or corporate greed, it doesn’t really matter which is which because the people in both worlds are the same people. The Occupy movement is important because this is the first popular uprising against the financial elite. They control our government and act with impunity. They must be stopped. They are the 1% that are being talked about.

I don’t know if our government needs radical reform. I’m inclined to think that it doesn’t. One of the problems with monarchy is that it requires the right people — and more often than not, you’ll have the wrong people. I don’t know that democracy solves this problem. You still need the right people in power. (Plus, you need the rule of law.) So, I think rather than thinking about reform, it is essential to take out the people currently holding power. I won’t necessarily agree with the new people, but all I want is a respect for the rule of law and a hatred for the old rulers. Part of this will involve voting people out. We must also disinvest in evil companies, or at least demand better CEO’s. We must break the current political parties. We must turn off cable news. A revolution needs to sweep the oligarchy from power.

There is another thing we can do, which is rather controversial: Resort to violence. It’s odd to find myself ambivalent about violence. So, I’ll talk through the reasons for violence. The fact is that the bankers are guilty of fraud and bringing down the economy. Instead of facing justice for crimes, they got big bonuses. Bullshit. If you go back a hundred years and further, these people would have been tarred, feathered, and run out of town. Perhaps justice can be done — if the mob carries it out instead of the courts. Oddly enough, when I discuss this with people — suggesting that instead of setting up encampments or protesting, the aggrieved burn down mansions, my suggestions face less pushback than I would expect. People seem less afraid of the idea than I do myself.

The only thing holding me back is that I wouldn’t do this myself. I couldn’t actually lead a mob, hold a torch, and light someone’s house on fire — even after all the nasty things they’ve done. Thus, I can’t put my money where my mouth is. So, I have no business advocating what I wouldn’t do myself. I hope that this sentiment comes from an inner civility and conscience, not from a lack of courage.

I can still promote all the things I mentioned earlier. I still want these people punished. I want their reputations tattered and their power taken away. I want them disgraced. And, once that has happened, I want their crimes prosecuted.

I don’t believe it will fix all our problems, but I do believe it is a good start in restoring the rule of law and restoring power to the people of America.

4 thoughts on “Time to Write

  1. Lloyd Nebres

    Important thoughts, and essential writing, Shawn. Do continue. When you put Ideas online like this, they assuredly won’t just vanish into the ether. Unless you disown them at some point… at which they could be “mashed up” into someone else’s notions of revolution.

    Wich brings me to my point: what you are advocating, what you want, is a revolution… but without the nasty bits. Afraid that’s not possible.

    Long ago in weblogging history, I wrote about how it was, participating in a revolutionary movement that indeed espoused the necessity of violence. And then becoming ultimately disillusioned by the necessity of the armed component of that struggle. So I won’t rehash all that here now; and anyway you probably know wherre to look, if you need to find it.

    I like how you jump these particular peaks, bypassing the valleys… intuitively getting that violent revolutions always eat their children.

    But the question remains: will it in fact require a revolution to change the way things are at right now, in your home country/culture? If you believe it to be so, you’ll need to come to terms with the fact that the nasty bits will be necessary. So you’ll need to find a pitchfork, and some gasoline for Molotov cocktails. ::chuckle::

  2. Lloyd Nebres

    P.S. While of course supportive of the impulse, I’ve been watching #OWS with bemused skepticism. From my perspective, it looks like Americans are reinventing this particular wheel, albeit with modern tools.

  3. Shawn R. McDonald Post author

    I know where to look, and I think I do need to find it.

    I’m not sure if a revolution is necessary. I guess I’ll have to do more reading, thinking, and writing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *